Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Outsourcing (offshoring) as a political issue...

Apparently the Democratic candidates know that outsourcing jobs overseas is a hot topic in middle America. India has taken notice of Hillary Clinton's newfound vocal opposition to offshore outsourcing, although I couldn't find any American press coverage. I will assume that India is paying attention because it will, of course, affect their economy as well.

Here's what was said in recent rallies:

Barack Obama: "We've got to stop giving tax breaks to companies that are shipping jobs overseas and invest those tax breaks in companies that are investing here in the United States of America."

Hillary Clinton "... we are going to rid the tax code of these loopholes and giveaways. We're going to stop giving a penny of your money to anybody who ships a job out of Texas, Ohio or anywhere else to another country."

Monday, February 4, 2008

Homeshoring is the outsourcing of American Jobs, to Americans (or whatever country you live in)

In America right now, we're facing economic fears and the looming idea of a recession.

There's been a lot of talk about the outsourcing of American jobs by the media and the political world. When candidates talk about outsourcing, they are typically referring to offshoring, but not the outsourcing industry that employs Americans. How come there hasn't been any talk of homesourcing?

It's a legitimate question. We're thinking it could be sheer ignorance... Homeshoring seems to be talked about more on the web, mostly in terms of the capabilities of VOIP technology and social media. Homeshoring companies use forums, chat rooms, webinars, and some other "fancy" stuff to connect their employees to a job online.

If you think about it, it's really amazing and hard to imagine that this could be the future of call centers. It's a fantastic solution for turnover rates in the customer service industry - something that brings consumers to spend more money. Customer service workers that don't have to succumb to the strange dynamics of a call center are a lot less grumpy. If you've ever worked for a traditional call center, you'll know what I'm talking about.

I worked at a call center when I was 20 years old, in one of those "get in a line" cubicles, where you shared headsets with an anonymous night crew member. We had to have log out of our computers on timed bathroom breaks. We were monitored all the time. We got yelled at by people on the phone all day, and we did the best we could to fix their problems - or sell them something. And our company meetings? They handed out prizes --- which was pretty much the best part of the job. We were eligible for raffles if we bothered to show up for the monthly team meeting. People quit all the time, and moved on to another company that we heard didn't "suck as bad". Customer service is a stressful industry. (And for a while, I took 240+ calls a day, and won a prize for it... A piece of paper with my name... 5+ ratings... Whoo-hoo!)

The actual setup of a call center is demeaning, at least depending on the pay. No offense to the customer service industry - but sometimes you feel like a caged animal in a mill. I always had a cold or the flu, just like my coworkers due to the shared headsets. There was always leftover coffee in the breakroom from some other shift. (You'd forget that it had been sitting there for 8 hours.) The call center crew was an interesting mix of people - we all had different reasons for working there. For the younger ones of us, the pay was good. But the truth was that a lot of people had kids, and child support, and few skills...or someone in their family they had to care for. Some people were alcoholics. Some people had to go to school at night and work all day. We even had a few people that were in the US on school visas to learn IT skills - and take them home to Pakistan.

We all stayed because we needed the money. Many of us were miserable at work. And misery spread easily when raises were halted (yup, telecom industry recession) and work reviews meant nothing. We complained a lot to eachother in the bathrooms. We provided lousy service sometimes. I knew somebody who pretended that I was the supervisor so we didn't have to escalate calls and possibly get in trouble. We had a system to know if we were being monitored and we got away with a lot more. We were all also busy writing our resumes and praying to work for these new internet companies - AOL was hiring smart people who were stuck in cruddy jobs and paying a lot more money. Northern Virginia was booming with jobs that people had never heard of - "forum managers" and and some of us had skills enough to pursue them. The web industry was booming.

Well, now it seems the telecom industry has caught up with the internet. They have their own technology to improve relationships with customers and make more money for corporate America. They're employing people who need jobs -- and learning how to treat them well. Sure, the pay itsn't the greatest, but the rewards are sound. Telecommuting give people more time with their families, reduces CO2 emissions, and improves employee loyalty. Many people that work for companies like Alpine Access and LiveOps sing their praises. (And yes, others have some valid complaints...Such as the instability of getting paid per call, rather than per hour.)

Homeshoring is a real economic trend that our Presidential candidates should be embracing -- and creating ways to encourage. If larger companies continue to follow the trend, it will actually help our environment, help moms and dads spend time with their families, and give caregivers and the disabled some added relief. It keeps jobs in the US and puts money in people's pockets that don't always have the ability to make money.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Outsourcing, Offshoring and Homeshoring

A new study by Brown-Wilson Group came out today regarding people's political preferences and beliefs about offshoring and outsourcing, revealing that offshore outsourcing would be a key decision factor in selecting their 2008 presidential candidate.

"Of the 3,000 Democrats, more than half (55%) of voters see offshore outsourcing as unpatriotic, a significant decrease from October 2004 when 93.9% of voting Democrats felt offshoring was anti-American. In the Super Tuesday collection of states, 84% of Democrats believe offshore outsourcing is unpatriotic. Less than 7.9% of Republicans viewed offshoring as unpatriotic in 2004 and 6.5% in 2008."

People apparently have a bit of difficulty defining the difference between offshoring and outsourcing. (Homesourcing and homeshoring are not words that are actually used in the article, which may be a part of the confusion.)

If you're unsure about the differences between these terms, here's the difference:

Outsourcing is the act of paying somebody, who does not work as a W-2 employee for your business, to complete a task. Virtual assistants, home-based telemarketers, and countless other contractors fulfill this task.

Offshoring is the act of moving these same types of functions overseas, to foreign workers, in countries where the labor is typically less expensive.

Homeshoring or homesourcing is the act of outsourcing these types of functions within your own country, typically to telecommuting personnel or independent contractors.

It's a shame that the word "homeshoring" is not used in these study results. Especially since the press release mentions public dissatisfaction with the views of the candidates. Homeshoring creates options for a whole other workforce, is environmentally friendly, and is considered to be an economical alternative that can help companies grow their businesses.

It would be really cool to hear some of the current presidential candidates give some praise to companies like LiveOps, Working Solutions, and Alpine Access. They're truly innovative businesses that are helping Americans keep their jobs no matter what their physical constraints. Homeshoring is one of the "most patriotic" outsourcing models around. When is the media and the government going to sit up and take notice? It would be nice to hear about tax breaks for some of these innovative employers.